Nimodipine prophylaxis in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, a question of tradition or evidence: A scoping review.

BACKGROUND: The prophylactic use of nimodipine following subarachnoid hemorrhage is a practice established four decades ago when clinical management differed from current and the concept of Delayed Cerebral Ischemia (DCI) was not established. The applicability of the original studies is limited by the fact of not reflecting current practice; by utilising a dichotomised outcome measure such as good neurological outcome versus death and vegetative state; by applying variable dosing regimens and including all causes of poor neurological outcome different than DCI. This study aims to review the available evidence to discuss the ongoing role of nimodipine in contemporaneous clinical practice. METHODS: PRISMA guidelines based review, evaluated the evidence on the prophylactic use of nimodipine. The following search engines: Medline, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science and PubMed, identified Randomized Control Trials (RCTs) with neurological benefit as outcome measure and the impact of fixed versus weight-based nimodipine dosing regimens. RESULTS: Eight RCT were selected. Three of those trials with a total of 349 patients, showed a reduction on death and vegetative state (pooled RR: 0.62; 95 % confidence interval-CI: 0.45, 0.86) related to DCI. Amongst all studies, all cause death (pooled RR = 0.73, [95 % CI: 0.56, 0.97]) favoured a fixed-dose regimen (pooled RR: 0.60; [95 % CI: 0.43, 0.85]). CONCLUSION: Available evidence demonstrates that nimodipine only reduces the risk for DCI-related death or vegetative state and that fixed-dose regimens favour all cause infarct and death independent of DCI. Contemporaneous studies assessing the benefit of nimodipine beyond death or vegetative states and applying individualized dosing are warranted.

Investigator-blinded, controlled, and randomized comparative study on 1565 nm non-ablative fractional laser versus 5% minoxidil for treatment of androgenetic alopecia.

BACKGROUND: Characterized by progressive hair loss due to an excessive response to androgens, androgenetic alopecia (AGA) affects up to 50% of males and females. Minoxidil is one of approved medications for AGA but inadequate responses occur in many patients. AIMS: To determine whether 1565 nm non-ablative fractional laser (NAFL) could yield better therapeutic benefits for patients with AGA as compared with 5% minoxidil. METHODS: Thirty patients with AGA were enrolled; they were randomly assigned into the laser or minoxidil treatment groups. For the laser treatment group, patients were treated by 1565 nm NAFL at 10 mJ, 250 spots/cm2 with 2 weeks intervals for 4 sessions in total. For the minoxidil treatment group, 1-milliliter of topical 5% minoxidil solution was applied to hair loss area twice a day. RESULTS: The primary outcomes were the changes in numerous hair growth indexes at the Week 10 as compared with the baselines. Both 1565 nm NAFL and 5% minoxidil led to significantly greater hair densities and diameters in patients at the Week 10 than the baselines (p < 0.01). As compared with 5% minoxidil, 1565 nm NAFL showed significantly greater improvements in total hair number, total hair density (hair/cm2), terminal hair number, terminal hair density (hair/cm2), number of hair follicle units, and average hair number/number of hair follicle units. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate that 1565 nm NAFL exhibits superior clinical efficacy in some aspects of hair growth to the topical minoxidil. It is a safe and effective modality in treating AGA.

Renin-Angiotensin System Modulation With Synthetic Angiotensin (1-7) and Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor-Biased Ligand in Adults With COVID-19: Two Randomized Clinical Trials.

Importance: Preclinical models suggest dysregulation of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection may increase the relative activity of angiotensin II compared with angiotensin (1-7) and may be an important contributor to COVID-19 pathophysiology. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of RAS modulation using 2 investigational RAS agents, TXA-127 (synthetic angiotensin [1-7]) and TRV-027 (an angiotensin II type 1 receptor-biased ligand), that are hypothesized to potentiate the action of angiotensin (1-7) and mitigate the action of the angiotensin II. Design, Setting, and Participants: Two randomized clinical trials including adults hospitalized with acute COVID-19 and new-onset hypoxemia were conducted at 35 sites in the US between July 22, 2021, and April 20, 2022; last follow-up visit: July 26, 2022. Interventions: A 0.5-mg/kg intravenous infusion of TXA-127 once daily for 5 days or placebo. A 12-mg/h continuous intravenous infusion of TRV-027 for 5 days or placebo. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was oxygen-free days, an ordinal outcome that classifies a patient's status at day 28 based on mortality and duration of supplemental oxygen use; an adjusted odds ratio (OR) greater than 1.0 indicated superiority of the RAS agent vs placebo. A key secondary outcome was 28-day all-cause mortality. Safety outcomes included allergic reaction, new kidney replacement therapy, and hypotension. Results: Both trials met prespecified early stopping criteria for a low probability of efficacy. Of 343 patients in the TXA-127 trial (226 [65.9%] aged 31-64 years, 200 [58.3%] men, 225 [65.6%] White, and 274 [79.9%] not Hispanic), 170 received TXA-127 and 173 received placebo. Of 290 patients in the TRV-027 trial (199 [68.6%] aged 31-64 years, 168 [57.9%] men, 195 [67.2%] White, and 225 [77.6%] not Hispanic), 145 received TRV-027 and 145 received placebo. Compared with placebo, both TXA-127 (unadjusted mean difference, -2.3 [95% CrI, -4.8 to 0.2]; adjusted OR, 0.88 [95% CrI, 0.59 to 1.30]) and TRV-027 (unadjusted mean difference, -2.4 [95% CrI, -5.1 to 0.3]; adjusted OR, 0.74 [95% CrI, 0.48 to 1.13]) resulted in no difference in oxygen-free days. In the TXA-127 trial, 28-day all-cause mortality occurred in 22 of 163 patients (13.5%) in the TXA-127 group vs 22 of 166 patients (13.3%) in the placebo group (adjusted OR, 0.83 [95% CrI, 0.41 to 1.66]). In the TRV-027 trial, 28-day all-cause mortality occurred in 29 of 141 patients (20.6%) in the TRV-027 group vs 18 of 140 patients (12.9%) in the placebo group (adjusted OR, 1.52 [95% CrI, 0.75 to 3.08]). The frequency of the safety outcomes was similar with either TXA-127 or TRV-027 vs placebo. Conclusions and Relevance: In adults with severe COVID-19, RAS modulation (TXA-127 or TRV-027) did not improve oxygen-free days vs placebo. These results do not support the hypotheses that pharmacological interventions that selectively block the angiotensin II type 1 receptor or increase angiotensin (1-7) improve outcomes for patients with severe COVID-19. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04924660.

Termografía en el efecto vasodilatador de anestésicos locales para el bloqueo troncular del primer dedo / Thermography of the vasodilator effect of local anaesthetics in ingrown toenail surgery

Objetivos: Los anestésicos locales de tipo amida empleados en cirugía podológica, como la lidocaína o mepivacaína, poseen cierto poder vasodilatador. Puesto que en algunas técnicas quirúrgicas puede haber sangrado postquirúrgico abundante, conocer si alguno de los dos anestésicos tiene mayor o menor efecto vasodilatador podría mejorar la respuesta postquirúrgica a estas técnicas. Así pues, el objetivo de este estudio fue comparar la respuesta térmica en el primer dedo tras la aplicación de los dos anestésicos al 2 %. Pacientes y métodos: Veintiséis participantes sanos se ofrecieron voluntarios para participar en este ensayo clínico aleatorizado con doble ciego. Los sujetos fueron divididos en dos grupos: lidocaína 2 % (n = 13) y mepivacaína 2 % (n = 13). Ambos grupos recibieron 1 cc del anestésico indicado. Se realizó una fotografía termográfica previa y tras 10 minutos al bloqueo troncular del hallux para cuantificar el aumento de temperatura. No se registraron complicaciones ni reacciones adversas. Resultados: Los dos grupos eran similares en cuanto a características antropométricas. No se observaron diferencias significativas entre grupos ni en la media de temperatura pre-anestésica (24.38 °C grupo lidocaína, 24.75 °C grupo mepivacaína, p = 0.918), ni en la media de temperatura postanestésica de los sujetos (31.3 °C para ambos grupos, p = 0.959). Los resultados de la diferencia pre-post anestésica fue de 6.91 °C para el grupo lidocaína y de 6.54 °C para el grupo mepivacaína, siendo esta diferencia estadísticamente no significativa (p = 0.7). Sin embargo, todos los sujetos (n = 26) mostraron un aumento de la temperatura tras la anestesia (p < 0.001). Conclusiones: Ambos fármacos mostraron una elevación de la temperatura en los sujetos y, por tanto, su poder vasoactivo. En cambio, no se evidenciaron diferencias significativas entre grupos...(AU)

Objectives: Local anaesthetics such as lidocaine or mepivacaine, commonly used in toenail surgery, have an associated vasodilator effect. Although is thought that lidocaine has a greater vasodilator effect than mepivacaine, there´s not strong in vivo evidence of this. So, the aim of this work was to assess the temperature increase experienced by the toes after be injected of 1 ml 2 % mepivacaine or lidocaine. Patients and methods: 26 participants were randomly divided into two groups and a pre-anæsthetic thermal image (Flir E60bx camera) was taken. Patients in group A (n = 13) received 1 ml of 2 % lidocaine, while those in group B (n = 13) received 1 ml of 2 % mepivacaine at four points of the hallux. After 10 minutes a second thermal image (post-anæsthetic image). Mean temperatures were assessed at the proximal phalanx and the pad of the hallux. Results: After application of the anæsthetic, the mean temperatures were 31.3 ± 3.07 °C at point 1 and 30.8 ± 3.08 °C at point 2 in the lidocaine group, and 31.3 ± 2.74 °C at point 1 and 29.5 ± 2.87 °C at point 2 in the mepivacaine group, with not statistically significant differences between them (p = 0.959 and p = 0.798). All the participants experienced temperature increases of between 5.13 °C and 6.91 °C, but there were no significant differences between groups (p = 0.7 and p = 0.0778). Conclusions: Even though most of the literature suggests that lidocaine has more potent vasodilator effect than mepivacaine, the present results do not reflect any real clinical impact distinguishing one drug from the other in the field block of the big toe, as measured with infrared thermal imaging.(AU)

Sildenafil for treating patients with COVID-19 and perfusion mismatch: a pilot randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 seems to affect the regulation of pulmonary perfusion. Hypoperfusion in areas of well-aerated lung parenchyma results in a ventilation-perfusion mismatch that can be characterized using subtraction computed tomography angiography (sCTA). This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of oral sildenafil in treating COVID-19 inpatients showing perfusion abnormalities in sCTA. METHODS: Triple-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in Chile in a tertiary-care hospital able to provide on-site sCTA scans and ventilatory support when needed between August 2020 and March 2021. In total, 82 eligible adults were admitted to the ED with RT-PCR-confirmed or highly probable SARS-COV-2 infection and sCTA performed within 24 h of admission showing perfusion abnormalities in areas of well-aerated lung parenchyma; 42 were excluded and 40 participants were enrolled and randomized (1:1 ratio) once hospitalized. The active intervention group received sildenafil (25 mg orally three times a day for seven days), and the control group received identical placebo capsules in the same way. Primary outcomes were differences in oxygenation parameters measured daily during follow-up (PaO2/FiO2 ratio and A-a gradient). Secondary outcomes included admission to the ICU, requirement of non-invasive ventilation, invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), and mortality rates. Analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat basis. RESULTS: Totally, 40 participants were enrolled (20 in the placebo group and 20 in the sildenafil group); 33 [82.5%] were male; and median age was 57 [IQR 41-68] years. No significant differences in mean PaO2/FiO2 ratios and A-a gradients were found between groups (repeated-measures ANOVA p = 0.67 and p = 0.69). IMV was required in 4 patients who received placebo and none in the sildenafil arm (logrank p = 0.04). Patients in the sildenafil arm showed a significantly shorter median length of hospital stay than the placebo group (9 IQR 7-12 days vs. 12 IQR 9-21 days, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: No statistically significant differences were found in the oxygenation parameters. Sildenafil treatment could have a potential therapeutic role regarding the need for IMV in COVID-19 patients with specific perfusion patterns in sCTA. A large-scale study is needed to confirm these results. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Sildenafil for treating patients with COVID-19 and perfusion mismatch: a pilot randomized trial, NCT04489446, Registered 28 July 2020, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04489446 .

Perianal Application of Glyceryl Trinitrate Ointment Versus Tocopherol Acetate Ointment in the Treatment of Chronic Anal Fissure: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Medical treatment, including glyceryl trinitrate ointment, represents the first step for the management of chronic anal fissure. However, glyceryl trinitrate ointment is associated with headache and, consequently, a high withdrawal rate of the treatment. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of the topical application of tocopherol acetate ointment on pain relief and chronic anal fissure epithelialization, comparing it with the effect of a standard treatment with glyceryl trinitrate ointment. DESIGN: This is a 2-parallel-group, single-center, randomized controlled, intent-to-treat clinical trial. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at the Garcilaso Clinic affiliated with Universidad Alfonso X (Madrid, Spain). PATIENTS: Patients with chronic anal fissure were selected. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned into 2 groups: patients receiving tocopherol acetate ointment and patients receiving glyceryl trinitrate ointment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was quantification of anal pain 8 weeks after beginning the treatment as measured by a Visual Analogue Scale ranging from 0 to 100 mm. The secondary end points were the healing rate (during the treatment period of 8 weeks) and the recurrence rate. RESULTS: One hundred sixty consecutive patients were treated, 80 in each group. By 8 weeks after treatment, mean anal pain score declined by 56.2 mm in the glyceryl trinitrate ointment group compared with a mean anal pain score decline of 67.1 mm in the tocopherol acetate ointment group (mean difference, 10.9 mm (95% CI, 4.3-18.6); p = 0.018). Sixteen weeks after finishing the therapy, the recurrence rate was 13.2% in the glyceryl trinitrate ointment group vs 2.9 in the tocopherol acetate ointment group (p = 0.031). LIMITATIONS: Limitations of the study include the absence of manometric measurements of the internal anal sphincter before and after the treatments and the use of glyceryl trinitrate ointment as an active comparator, whereas calcium channel blockers are actually the standard treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Anal pain was significantly lower in the tocopherol acetate ointment group than in the glyceryl trinitrate ointment group at 8 weeks after treatment. Tocopherol acetate ointment achieved a greater healing rate and a lower recurrence rate 16 weeks after finishing the treatment. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B751. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Identifier: NCT03787030.APLICACIÓN PERIANAL DE POMADA DE TRINITRATO DE GLICERILO FRENTE A LA POMADA DE ACETATO DE TOCOFEROL EN EL TRATAMIENTO DE LA FISURA ANAL CRÓNICA: UN ENSAYO CLÍNICO ALEATORIZADOANTECEDENTES:El tratamiento médico, incluida la pomada de trinitrato de glicerilo, representa el primer paso para el tratamiento de la fisura anal crónica. Sin embargo, la pomada de trinitrato de glicerilo se asocia con cefalea y, en consecuencia, una alta tasa de cancelación del tratamiento.OBJETIVO:El objetivo del presente estudio fue evaluar el efecto de la aplicación tópica de pomada de acetato de tocoferol en el alivio del dolor y la epitelización de la fisura anal crónica, comparándolo con el efecto de un tratamiento estándar con pomada de trinitrato de glicerilo.DISEÑO:Ensayo clínico con intención de tratar controlado, aleatorizado, de un solo centro, con dos grupos paralelos.ESCENARIO:Clínica Garcilaso adscrita a la Universidad Alfonso X (Madrid, España).PACIENTES:Pacientes con fisura anal crónica.INTERVENCIONES:Los pacientes fueron aleatorizados en 2 grupos: pacientes que recibieron pomada de acetato de tocoferol y pacientes que recibieron pomada de trinitrato de glicerilo.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:El criterio de valoración principal fue la cuantificación del dolor anal 8 semanas después de comenzar el tratamiento, medido por la escala analógica visual que varía de 0 a 100 mm. Los criterios de valoración secundarios fueron la tasa de curación (durante el período de tratamiento de 8 semanas) y la tasa de recurrencia.RESULTADOS:Se trataron ciento sesenta pacientes consecutivos, 80 en cada grupo. A las ocho semanas después del tratamiento, la puntuación media de dolor anal se redujo en 56.2 mm en el grupo de pomada de trinitrato de glicerilo en comparación con una disminución de la puntuación de dolor anal medio de 67.1 mm en el grupo de pomada de acetato de tocoferol (diferencia media: 10.9 mm (intervalo de confianza del 95%; 4.3 a 18.6; p = 0.018) Dieciséis semanas después de finalizar la terapia, la tasa de recurrencia fue del 13.2% en el grupo de pomada de trinitrato de glicerilo frente a 2.9 en el grupo de pomada de acetato de tocoferol (p = 0.031).LIMITACIONES:Ausencia de medidas manométricas del esfínter anal interno antes y después de los tratamientos. Ungüento de trinitrato de glicerilo como comparador activo, mientras que los bloqueadores de los canales de calcio son en realidad el tratamiento estándar de oro.CONCLUSIONES:El dolor anal fue significativamente menor en el grupo de ungüento de acetato de tocoferol que en el grupo de ungüento de trinitrato de glicerilo a las 8 semanas después del tratamiento. La pomada de acetato de tocoferol logró una mayor tasa de curación y una menor tasa de recurrencia 16 semanas después de finalizar el tratamiento. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B751. (Traducción-Dr. Jorge Silva Velazco).

Inhaled Pulmonary Vasodilator Therapy in Adult Lung Transplant: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) is commonly administered for selectively inhaled pulmonary vasodilation and prevention of oxidative injury after lung transplant (LT). Inhaled epoprostenol (iEPO) has been introduced worldwide as a cost-saving alternative to iNO without high-grade evidence for this indication. Objective: To investigate whether the use of iEPO will lead to similar rates of severe/grade 3 primary graft dysfunction (PGD-3) after adult LT when compared with use of iNO. Design, Setting, and Participants: This health system-funded, randomized, blinded (to participants, clinicians, data managers, and the statistician), parallel-designed, equivalence clinical trial included 201 adult patients who underwent single or bilateral LT between May 30, 2017, and March 21, 2020. Patients were grouped into 5 strata according to key prognostic clinical features and randomized per stratum to receive either iNO or iEPO at the time of LT via 1:1 treatment allocation. Interventions: Treatment with iNO or iEPO initiated in the operating room before lung allograft reperfusion and administered continously until cessation criteria met in the intensive care unit (ICU). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was PGD-3 development at 24, 48, or 72 hours after LT. The primary analysis was for equivalence using a two one-sided test (TOST) procedure (90% CI) with a margin of 19% for between-group PGD-3 risk difference. Secondary outcomes included duration of mechanical ventilation, hospital and ICU lengths of stay, incidence and severity of acute kidney injury, postoperative tracheostomy placement, and in-hospital, 30-day, and 90-day mortality rates. An intention-to-treat analysis was performed for the primary and secondary outcomes, supplemented by per-protocol analysis for the primary outcome. Results: A total of 201 randomized patients met eligibility criteria at the time of LT (129 men [64.2%]). In the intention-to-treat population, 103 patients received iEPO and 98 received iNO. The primary outcome occurred in 46 of 103 patients (44.7%) in the iEPO group and 39 of 98 (39.8%) in the iNO group, leading to a risk difference of 4.9% (TOST 90% CI, -6.4% to 16.2%; P = .02 for equivalence). There were no significant between-group differences for secondary outcomes. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients undergoing LT, use of iEPO was associated with similar risks for PGD-3 development and other postoperative outcomes compared with the use of iNO. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03081052.

Effects of sildenafil and tadalafil on skin flap viability.

Vascular complication is one of the causes of skin flap healing failure. Sildenafil and tadalafil, a type-5 phosphodiesterase inhibitor, can improve flap viability, however, the action mechanisms involved in this process are still unclear. To assess the effects of orally administered sildenafil and tadalafil on the healing kinetics and skin flap viability, sixty-two Wistar rats were divided into three groups: control (n = 22), sildenafil (n = 20), and tadalafil (n = 20). The solutions were administered orally (dose: 10 mg/kg) immediately after the surgical procedure and then every 24 h. At postoperative days 7 and 14, the skin flap samples were collected, submitted to histological processing and evaluated under optical microscopy. In experimental groups (sildenafil and tadalafil), we found an increased vascularization (p < 0.05) on the 7th and 14th day associated with the ulcer size decrease on the 14th day, although it was not significant. There was a higher influx of neutrophils and a decrease of mononuclear population on the 7th day (p < 0.05). On the 14th day, these differences were observed only in the tadalafil group (p < 0.05). This study suggested positive results with the use of sildenafil and tadalafil as adjuvant drugs in skin flap viability.

Treprostinil palmitil inhibits the hemodynamic and histopathological changes in the pulmonary vasculature and heart in an animal model of pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Treprostinil palmitil (TP) is a long-acting inhaled pulmonary vasodilator prodrug of treprostinil (TRE). In this study, TP was delivered by inhalation (treprostinil palmitil inhalation suspension, TPIS) in a rat Sugen 5416 (Su)/hypoxia (Hx) model of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) to evaluate its effects on hemodynamics, pulmonary vascular remodeling, and cardiac performance and histopathology. Male Sprague-Dawley rats received Su (20 mg/kg, s.c), three weeks of Hx (10% O2) and 5 or 10 weeks of normoxia (Nx). TPIS was given during the 5-10 week Nx period after the Su/Hx challenge. Su/Hx increased the mean pulmonary arterial blood pressure (mPAP) and right heart size (Fulton index), reduced cardiac output (CO), stroke volume (SV) and heart rate (HR), and increased the thickness and muscularization of the pulmonary arteries along with obliteration of small pulmonary vessels. In both the 8- and 13-week experiments, TPIS at inhaled doses ranging from 39.6 to 134.1 µg/kg, QD, dose-dependently improved pulmonary vascular hemodynamics, reduced the increase in right heart size, enhanced cardiac performance, and attenuated most of the histological changes induced by the Su/Hx challenge. The PDE5 inhibitor sildenafil, administered at an oral dose of 50 mg/kg, BID for 10 weeks, was not as effective as TPIS. These results in Su/Hx challenged rats demonstrate that inhaled TPIS may have superior effects to oral sildenafil. We speculate that the improvement of the pathobiology in this PAH model induced by TPIS involves effects on pulmonary vascular remodeling due to the local effects of TRE in the lungs.

Diagnostic and prognostic role of nitroglycerin-induced dilation in patients with suspected vasospastic angina, combined with ergonovine provocation test.

The diagnostic and prognostic role of nitroglycerin-induced dilation (NID) combined with ergonovine provocation test in patients with suspected VSA patients is not clear. A total of 438 consecutive patients who underwent the ergonovine provocation test for the diagnosis of vasospastic angina (VSA) were enrolled. Patients with VSA (n = 52) had a significantly greater coronary response to ergonovine (- 84.3 ± 10.5% vs. - 38.4 ± 17.9%, p < 0.001) and NID (26.3 ± 31.0% vs. 12.5 ± 19.0%, p < 0.001) than non-VSA patients. However, positive NID (more than 13.8% dilation, n = 170) showed a poor accuracy (AUC 0.64 [95% CI: 0.56-0.73], p = 0.001, sensitivity 60.4%, specificity 61.3%) for the diagnosis of VSA by ergonovine provocation test. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) occurred more frequently in the VSA group than in the non-VSA group (9.6% vs. 2.2%, p = 0.006). In addition, the positive NID group showed a lower rate of MACE than the negative NID group (1.2% vs. 4.3%, p = 0.021). Interestingly, the group of VSA with negative NID had poor prognosis than any other combinations (Log-rank, p < 0.0001). Although NID had a limited role in the detection of VSA defined by ergonovine provocation test, NID combined with the ergonovine provocation test has an additive prognostic role in the clinical outcomes in patients with suspected VSA.

Clinical values of resting electrocardiography in patients with known or suspected chronic coronary artery disease: a stress perfusion cardiac MRI study.

BACKGROUND: Electrocardiography (ECG) is an essential investigation in patients with chronic coronary artery disease (CAD). However, evidence regarding the diagnostic and prognostic value of ECG in this population is limited. Therefore, we sought to determine whether baseline ECG abnormalities were associated with myocardial ischemia and cardiac events in patients with known or suspected chronic CAD. METHODS: Consecutive patients with known (n = 146) or suspected chronic CAD (n = 349) referred for adenosine stress cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) between 2011 and 2014 were enrolled. Resting ECGs were classified as major, minor, and no abnormalities. Predictors of myocardial ischemia on CMR and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) including cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, hospitalization for heart failure and late revascularization (> 180 days after CMR) were evaluated. RESULTS: Average age was 69 ± 11 years (51% men). One hundred and eighty-five patients (37.4%) had major and 154 (31.1%) had minor ECG abnormalities. In patients with suspected CAD, myocardial ischemia was presented in 83 patients (23.8%). Multivariable analysis demonstrated major ECG abnormality as the strongest predictor of myocardial ischemia (HR 2.51; 95% CI 1.44-4.36; p = 0.001). Adding ECG to clinical pretest probability models improved the prediction of myocardial ischemia in ROC analyses (p = 0.04). In the whole cohort (n = 495), 91 MACE occurred during the median follow-up period of 4.8 years. Multivariable analysis showed that diabetes mellites, history of heart failure, prior revascularization, left ventricular ejection fraction, ischemia, and major ECG abnormality were independent predictors of MACE. CONCLUSION: Abnormal resting ECG is common in patients with known or suspected chronic CAD. ECG had important diagnostic and prognostic values in this population.

Botulinum Toxin Injection Plus Topical Diltiazem for Chronic Anal Fissure: A Randomized Double-Blind Clinical Trial and Long-term Outcome.

BACKGROUND: Chemical sphincterotomy avoids the risk of permanent incontinence in the treatment of chronic anal fissure, but it does not reach the efficacy of surgery and recurrence is high. Drug combination has been proposed to overcome these drawbacks. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the clinical, morphological, and functional effects of combined therapy with botulinum toxin injection and topical diltiazem in chronic anal fissure and to assess the long-term outcome after healing. DESIGN: This is a randomized, controlled, double-blind, 2-arm, parallel-group trial with a long-term follow-up. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at a tertiary care center. PATIENTS: A total of 70 consecutive patients were referred to the gastroenterology department of a hospital in Valencia, Spain. INTERVENTION: After botulinum toxin injection (20 IU), patients were randomly assigned to local diltiazem (diltiazem group) or placebo gel (placebo group) for 12 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was fissure healing (evaluated by video register by 3 independent physicians). Secondary outcomes included symptomatic relief (30-day diary), effect on anal sphincters (manometry), safety, and long-term recurrence (24 months and 10 years). RESULTS: Healing was achieved per protocol in 13 of 25 (52%) patients of the diltiazem group and 11 of 30 (36.7%) patients of the placebo group (p = 0.25); on an intention-to-treat basis in 37.1% and 31.4% (p = 0.61). Both groups displayed significant reduction of anal pressures. Thirty percent reported minor and transitory incontinence, without differences between groups. Nine (69.2%) of the diltiazem group and 6 (54.5%) of the placebo group experienced a relapse at 24 months (p = 0.67). The overall recurrence rate at 10 years was 83.3% (20/24 patients). LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by the loss of patients during the trial. The low healing rate led to a small cohort to assess recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Combined botulinum toxin injection and topical diltiazem is not superior to botulinum toxin injection in the treatment of chronic anal fissure. Both options offer suboptimal healing rates. Long-term recurrence is high (>80% at 10 years) and might appear at any time after healing. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B527. INYECCIN DE TOXINA BOTULNICA MS DILTIAZEM TPICO EN FISURA ANAL CRNICA UN ENSAYO CLNICO ALEATORIZADO DOBLE CIEGO Y RESULTADOS A LARGO PLAZO: ANTECEDENTES:La esfinterotomía química evita el riesgo de incontinencia permanente en el tratamiento de la fisura anal crónica, pero no alcanza la eficacia de la cirugía y la recurrencia es alta. Se ha propuesto la combinación de fármacos para superar estos inconvenientes.OBJETIVO:Comparar los efectos clínicos, morfológicos y funcionales de la terapia combinada con inyección de toxina botulínica y diltiazem tópico en fisura anal crónica y evaluar el resultado a largo plazo después de la cicatrización.DISEÑO:Ensayo aleatorizado, controlado, doble ciego, de dos brazos, de grupos paralelos con un seguimiento a largo plazo.ESCENARIO:Estudio realizado en un centro de atención terciaria.PACIENTES:Un total de 70 pacientes consecutivos referidos al servicio de gastroenterología de un hospital de Valencia, España.INTERVENCIÓN:Después de la inyección de toxina botulínica (20UI), los pacientes fueron asignados al azar a diltiazem local (grupo de diltiazem) o gel de placebo (grupo de placebo) durante 12 semanas.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:El resultado primario fue la cicatrización de la fisura (evaluado por registro de video por tres médicos independientes). Los resultados secundarios incluyeron alivio sintomático (diario de 30 días), efecto sobre los esfínteres anales (manometría), seguridad y recurrencia a largo plazo (24 meses y 10 años).RESULTADOS:La curación se logró por protocolo en 13/25 (52%) en el grupo de Diltiazem y 11/30 (36,7%) en el grupo de Placebo (p = 0.25); por intención de tratar en el 37.1% y el 31.4%, respectivamente (p = 0.61). Ambos grupos mostraron una reducción significativa de las presiones anales. El 30% refirió incontinencia leve y transitoria, sin diferencias entre grupos. 9 (69.2%) del grupo de Diltiazem y 6 (54.5%) del grupo de placebo recurrieron a los 24 meses (p = 0.67). La tasa global de recurrencia a los 10 años fue del 83.3% (20/24 pacientes).LIMITACIONES:La pérdida de pacientes a lo largo del ensayo. La baja tasa de curación llevó a una pequeña cohorte para evaluar la recurrencia.CONCLUSIONES:La inyección combinada de toxina botulínica y diltiazem tópico no es superior a la inyección de TB en el tratamiento de la fisura anal crónica. Ambas opciones ofrecen tasas de curación subóptimas. La recurrencia a largo plazo es alta (> 80% a los 10 años) y puede aparecer en cualquier momento después de la curación. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B527.

Predictors of Perioperative Vasoactive Drug Requirement During Retroperitoneal Adrenalectomy for Pheochromocytoma: A Retrospective Exploratory Study.

The aim of the present study was to test a hypothesis that baseline systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) assessed by method of transpulmonary thermodilution predicts perioperative requirement for vasoactive drugs. The primary outcomes were: (1) peak vasoactive-inotropic score (VIS) and (2) peak dose of hypotensive drugs at any stage of surgery. The main exposure variable was baseline SVRI. Hemodynamics were retrospectively assessed by transpulmonary thermodilution in 50 adults who had undergone posterior retroperitoneal surgery for pheochromocytoma. Univariate linear regression analysis showed predictive value of SVRI on VIS [regression coefficient, 95% CI; 0.024 (0.005, 0.4), p=0.015]. Other significant factors were the history of peak diastolic pressure, baseline MAP, baseline betablocker therapy, and history of coronary artery disease (CAD). After adjustment of SVRI for the history of CAD, its prognostic value became non-significant [0.018 (0.008, 0.03), p=0.063 and 29.6 (19, 40.2), p=0.007 for SVRI and history of CAD, respectively]. Requirements of vasodilators were predicted by baseline adrenergic activity [0.37 (0.005, 0.74), p=0.047]. In conclusion, baseline SVRI is associated with perioperative requirement of vasopressor drugs, but history of CAD is a stronger prognostic factor for vasopressor support. Perioperative requirement in vasodilators is associated with baseline adrenergic activity.

The Role of 20-HETE, COX, Thromboxane Receptors, and Blood Plasma Antioxidant Status in Vascular Relaxation of Copper-Nanoparticle-Fed WKY Rats.

Recently, the addition of copper nanoparticles (NPs) in a daily diet (6.5 mg/kg) was studied in different animal models as a possible alternative to ionic forms. Male Wistar-Kyoto rats (24-week-old, n = 11) were fed with copper, either in the form of carbonate salt (Cu6.5) or metal-based copper NPs (NP6.5), for 8 weeks. The third group was fed with a half dose of each (NP3.25 + Cu3.25). The thoracic aorta and blood plasma was studied. Supplementation with NP6.5 decreased the Cu (×0.7), Cu/Zn-ratio (×0.6) and catalase (CAT, ×0.7), and increased Zn (×1.2) and superoxide dismutase (SOD, ×1.4). Meanwhile, NP3.25 + Cu3.25 decreased the Cu/Zn-ratio (×0.7), and CAT (×0.7), and increased the daily feed intake (×1.06). Preincubation with either the selective cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitor, or the non-selective COX-1/2 inhibitor attenuated vasodilation of rat thoracic aorta in the NP6.5 group exclusively. However, an increased vasodilator response was observed in the NP6.5 and NP3.25 + Cu3.25 group of rats after preincubation with an inhibitor of 20-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid (20-HETE) formation, and the thromboxane receptor (TP) antagonist. Significant differences were observed between the NP6.5 and NP3.25 + Cu3.25 groups of rats in: dietary intake, acetylcholine-induced vasodilation, and response to COX-inhibitors. Copper NPs in a standard daily dose had more significant effects on the mechanism(s) responsible for the utilization of reactive oxygen species in the blood plasma with the participation of prostanoids derived from COX-2 in the vascular relaxation. Dietary copper NPs in both doses modified vasodilation through the vasoconstrictor 20-HETE and the TP receptors.

Artemisinin Improves Acetylcholine-Induced Vasodilatation in Rats with Primary Hypertension.

PURPOSE: Endothelial dysfunction and the subsequent decrease in endothelium-dependent vascular relaxation of small arteries are major features of hypertension. Artemisinin, a well-known antimalarial drug, has been shown to exert protecting roles against endothelial cell injury in cardiac and pulmonary vascular diseases. The current study aimed to investigate the effects of artemisinin on endothelium-dependent vascular relaxation and arterial blood pressure, as well as the potential signalling pathways in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs). METHODS: In this study, acetylcholine (ACh)-induced dose-dependent relaxation assays were performed to evaluate vascular endothelial function after treatment with artemisinin. Artemisinin was administered to the rats by intravenous injection or to arteries by incubation for the acute exposure experiments, and it was administered to rats by intraperitoneal injection for 28 days for the chronic experiments. RESULTS: Both acute and chronic administration of artemisinin decreased the heart rate and improved ACh-induced endothelium-dependent relaxation but negligibly affected the arterial blood pressure in SHRs. Incubation with artemisinin decreased basal vascular tension, NAD(P)H oxidase activity and reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels, but it also increased endothelial nitric oxide (NO) synthase (eNOS) activity and NO levels in the mesenteric artery, coronary artery, and pulmonary artery of SHRs. Artemisinin chronic administration to SHRs increased the protein expression of eNOS and decreased the protein expression of the NAD(P)H oxidase subunits NOX-2 and NOX-4 in the mesenteric artery. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that treatment with artemisinin has beneficial effects on reducing the heart rate and basal vascular tension and improving endothelium-dependent vascular relaxation in hypertension, which might occur by increasing eNOS activation and NO release and inhibiting NAD(P)H oxidase derived ROS production.

Clinical outcomes of nicorandil administration in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention is the treatment of choice in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and no-reflow phenomenon is still an unsolved problem. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EmBase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for relevant randomized controlled trials. The primary endpoint was the incidence of major adverse cardiac events and the secondary endpoint was the incidences of no-reflow phenomenon and complete resolution of ST-segment elevation. RESULTS: Eighteen randomized controlled trials were enrolled. Nicorandil significantly reduced the incidence of no-reflow phenomenon (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.36-0.59; P < 0.001; I2 = 0%) and major adverse cardiac events (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.27-0.64; P < 0.001; I2 = 52%). For every single outcome of major adverse cardiac events, only heart failure and ventricular arrhythmia were significantly improved with no heterogeneity (OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.23-0.57, P < 0.001; OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.31-0.60, P < 0.001 respectively). A combination of intracoronary and intravenous nicorandil administration significantly reduced the incidence of major adverse cardiac events with no heterogeneity (OR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.13-0.43, P < 0.001; I2 = 0%), while a single intravenous administration could not (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.40-1.06, P = 0.09; I2 = 52%). CONCLUSIONS: Nicorandil can significantly improve no-reflow phenomenon and major adverse cardiac events in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. The beneficial effects on major adverse cardiac events might be driven by the improvements of heart failure and ventricular arrhythmia. A combination of intracoronary and intravenous administration might be an optimal usage of nicorandil.

Influence of nimodipine combined with ulinastatin on neurological function and inflammatory reaction in patients with cerebral vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to discuss the influence of nimodipine+ulinastatin on the neurological function and inflammatory reaction in patients with cerebral vasospasm (CVS) after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). METHODS: Overall, 90 patients with CVS after SAH who were admitted to our hospital were enrolled in this study and randomly divided into research and control groups (n = 45 for both groups). On the basis of conventional therapy, patients in the control group were injected with ulinastatin and those in the research group were injected with ulinastatin+nimodipine through an intravenous drip for 7 days with the others the same as those of the control group. RESULTS: Blood flow velocity in all cerebral arteries was lower in the research group than in the control group after treatment (P < 0.05). Calcitonin gene-related peptide and nitric oxide levels were higher in the research group than in the control group after treatment (P < 0.05). Endothelin levels were lower in the research group than in the control group (P < 0.05). The total effective rate was higher in the research group than in the control group (P < 0.05). Glasgow Coma Scale scores were higher in the research group than in the control group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The drug combination of nimodipine and ulinastatin improved blood flow and neurological function in patients with CVS after SAH and enhanced the therapeutic efficacy; the underlying mechanism may be associated with the regulation of vascular endothelial dilatation function and the inhibition of relevant inflammatory factors' expression.

Early Propranolol Is Associated With Lower Risk of Venous Thromboembolism After Traumatic Brain Injury.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) results in an elaborate systemic cascade of secondary injury elicited in part by an intrinsic catecholamine response, which ultimately leads to changes in inflammation and coagulopathy. Attenuation of this catecholamine response with agents such as propranolol confers a survival advantage. The related impact of propranolol on venous thromboembolism (VTE) after TBI is largely unknown. STUDY DESIGN: A single institution retrospective review was conducted of all TBI patients requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission with an injury severity scale (ISS) ≥ 25 from January 2013 to May 2015. Patients who received at least one dose of propranolol within 24 hours of admission (PROP) were compared to patients who did not receive any doses of propranolol (NPROP) during their hospitalization. RESULTS: Of the 131 patients analyzed, 31 (23.7%) patients received propranolol. The PROP cohort was more severely injured overall (ISS 29 vs 26.5, P = .02). While unadjusted VTE rates were similar (16.1% vs 19.0%, P = .72), the adjusted VTE rate was lower in the PROP cohort (AOR 0.20 (95% CI 0.04-0.97), adjusted P-value < .05). CONCLUSION: Propranolol use in TBI patients who have sustained critical injuries may mitigate the risk of VTE. The mechanism by which this outcome is achieved requires further investigation.